In my last review of the non-mining stocks in the materials sector (7 December 2012), I was lukewarm about all of these stocks. Essentially, none of them is big enough to challenge their mining counterparts for a place to represent the materials sector as high-conviction stocks – and none seemed likely to add some spice as smaller cap stocks. I favoured Amcor (international packaging) over Orica (chemicals and explosives). I did not like the steel companies due to their seeming dependence on government support.
As it turns out from Table 1, Bluescope Steel (44%) did very well and Amcor (21.2%) put in a credible effort. The materials sector as a whole did very poorly (-14.3%) because of the problem that faced the mining stocks. If we compare the capital gains in Table 1 to the gain of 4.6% for the ASX 200 over the same period, four stocks of the top 100 (Bluescope, Amcor, Alumina and James Hardie) and two small cap stocks (Dulux and Fletcher Building) beat the ASX 200.
The falling dollar creates some issues because of the uncertainty it brings to planning but, if it settles down to a figure well below parity, the lower dollar might also benefit some of the non-mining materials stocks. However, I still favour other parts of the ASX 200 – in particular, the big miners in the broader materials sector and the big banks, until the market fully absorbs the tapering talk and the China credit squeeze.
Important: This content has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual. It does not constitute formal advice. Consider the appropriateness of the information in regards to your circumstances.
Also in the Switzer Super Report
- Penny Pryor:Â About last night…
- Barrie Dunstan:Â What now for stock selection?
- James Dunn:Â Treasury Wine Estates, CSR, Incitec Pivot to benefit from low $A
- Penny Pryor:Â Gen Y and the case for an SMSF
- Nathan Lim:Â Australian Ethical Investment on Stratasys
- Paul Rickard: Question of the week – MCG and BOQ outlook