- Switzer Report - https://switzerreport.com.au -

It’s Trump-v-the Fed. Trump will win!

[table “246” not found /]

Understanding last week’s market action gets down to the Fed’s rate rise decision versus the Trump effect. And while the former is slowing down, the latter (the earnings and economic outlooks) suggests Trump will win.

By the way, I could’ve written this even without Donald heading for the White House but the Dow wouldn’t be at 19,843. It would be up from Election Day but wouldn’t have had the unexpected impact of the Trump love and massive economic expectations of what a world economy could do with Donald at the helm!

Last week, I was pondering what might bring a pullback. The Fed’s expected interest rate rise was a consideration. The experts all argued, “it was baked in” and yes, the Yanks on Wall Street kept buying stocks as the Dow Jones average approached 20,000. However we copped some backwash, as the currency effects on commodity prices outweighed the Trump effect.

To be accurate, even the US market has lost momentum, with this being the fourth day that the Dow has struggled to beat 20,000. And I don’t see enough new news and good news to get the index over this important psychological level in the short term. But things can change.

But hell, the most watched market index in the world has done plenty since Donald Trump won the US poll on November 8.

In case you forgot, the Dow rose 265 points before the election, when the market thought Hillary Clinton was a shoe in. And while the Dow futures was heading for a 1000-point loss, after Donald’s victory speech it all changed. The Dow has shot up 8.3% over that time and even if we’ve had our Santa Claus rally early (though I don’t rule out the Americans giving Dow 20,000 one more old school try before we start popping champagne on New Year’s Eve), the delay in breaking this level suggests market influencers are tempted to take profit.

This has been happening here with material stocks and why wouldn’t short-term players do this, especially as the greenback shot up on the Fed’s decision and commodity prices slipped, as you’d expect. As I write, the Oz dollar is 72.93 US cents, which says it all about the Americans’ second rate rise in a decade!

However, don’t stress, as this is a positive for domestic economic growth and, inevitably, for the stock market, especially if commodity prices can sustain these or even slightly higher levels, which many analysts have signed up to. Remember, the likes of Macquarie have a BHP target at $28. It closed at $25 yesterday.

What shouldn’t be ignored is that the Fed decision not only brought a quarter per cent rise in the official Fed rate but predicted three more rises in 2017, rather than the expected two. And this gave the market a pause to think. The Trump junkies hadn’t focused on the downside of Trump-love, so reality has started to bite a little. That said, I think it’s all healthy and what we’re seeing is the US economy and monetary system heading towards normality, with higher interest rates, inflation and economic growth because without growth happening, with a Trump push added, then three rate rises won’t happen.

Ironically, if the above comes to pass and the US doesn’t grow strong enough to warrant three rate rises, I’ll be looking for a sizeable correction next year. I’m not expecting this but it will be a part of my brief to be on the lookout for it. And that’s why you’re reading this now.

Back home, we lost 0.5% for the week but let’s not forget we are influenced by commodity prices and a higher greenback always hurts those prices. Recall on November 8, our S&P/ASX 200 index was at 5257.8. It’s now at 5532.9 so we’ve pocketed a 5.2% gain in six weeks, which means we do need to acknowledge the Trump impact on our portfolio of stocks for 2016.

Including dividends, we’re up about 10% but from the disastrous lows of February, we’re around 18% higher and this gives us the clue that we should carry into 2017. Stocks (and especially materials) were going higher on better expectations for the world economy and Donald has been cream – a lot of cream – on top of the economic cake!

This week, iron ore prices topped out at $US83.58 – a two-year high! – and the likes of Rio Tinto lost 5.4% over the week. That says it all but it has done well since its February lows.

And don’t forget that all this good Trump news has hit the gold price and that acts as a weight on our market index sneaking higher.

I like the M&A action with APN Outdoor and Ooh Media proposing a tie up and Macquarie leading a consortium for a $7.3 billion bid for Tatts to trump Tabcorp’s $6.8 billion offer.

A big feature of this week was the economic story and in Switzer Daily I went looking for the data dropped over the December quarter so far to try and determine if another negative quarter was possible. I hate the thought that my media mates could pull out the “Recession!” headline, if we get two negative quarters.

I kept count and 14 good economic news stories were discovered for the quarter, versus three bad ones. However I still thought I’d seen more bad news tales on the economy than that, so I investigated more. And what did I find?

Economics is a strange old social science and what I found was a lot of the bad news reported in the December quarter was about the September quarter. The delay in getting stats on, say, building approvals or actual construction, means we hear bad September quarter news in December. And the negative economic growth number of 0.5% was a classic case in point.

I’m tipping a positive December quarter, unless Scott Morrison cuts government spending too hard or if imports surged in anticipation of big growth in 2017. Imports can reduce growth rates in the short term but can power it up in the medium term, if they are capital or business investment goods. A lot of recent imports have been exactly that.

What I liked

What I didn’t like

By the way

Like with most weeks, my “likes” KO my “don’t likes”, as Dr. John Hewson pointed out a few weeks ago on my TV show. Even though I know I’m biased by my positivity, I do confront really bad news – potential and actual – when it surfaces. On balance, good news has trumped bad news this year and that’s why we’re up 10% (including dividends) and up over 22% since February (if we throw in dividends).

When the bad news starts to beat the good news, that’s when I’ll become a market pessimist but I think we might have a year or two to go until that happens.

Top Stocks – how they fared

[table “245” not found /]

The week in review

What moved the market?

Calls of the Week

The week ahead

Australia

Overseas

Food for thought

What if Christmas, he thought, doesn’t come from a store? What if Christmas, perhaps, means a little bit more?

– Dr Seuss.

Last week’s TV roundup

Stocks shorted

ASIC releases data daily on the major short positions in the market. These are the stocks with the highest proportion of their ordinary shares that have been sold short, which could suggest investors are expecting the price to come down. The table also shows how this has changed compared to the week before.

This week the biggest mover was Estia Health, with its short position increasing 1 percentage point to 8.48%.

20161216shortstocks

Source: ASIC

Chart of the week

Yellen’s lot plots their dots!dotplot

Source: FOMC

Each Federal Reserve policy maker has shown where they think the Fed’s fund rate should be at the end of the year, over the next few years. The chart above shows that the median FOMC member see rates going to between 1.25% and 1.5% at the end of 2017. That could suggest three hikes – of 25 basis points each – over 2017 (up from two hikes previously). They also see the long-term rate at 3%.

Top five most clicked stories

Recent Switzer Super Reports

Season’s Greetings

Have a great Christmas and holiday period and I look forward to our Saturday morning catch up in 2017 and beyond.

Go Australia!

Important: This content has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual. It does not constitute formal advice. Consider the appropriateness of the information in regards to your circumstances.