- Switzer Report - https://switzerreport.com.au -

Brexit beaten by big banks

[table “190” not found /]

What’s a few points among investing friends, especially when the stock market has endured the post-Brexit shock to the financial system?

Yesterday, the S&P/ASX 200 index finished at 5246. However, over the first day of the new financial year, we went within three points of 5280, which was where our market was the day before we were Brexited!

I thought a 13 point gain on Friday was OK, considering we thought the Poms had condemned us to another period of fear and loathing, thanks to their crazy decision to leave the EU. And not even the often-accused too optimistic Peter Switzer would’ve tipped a 2.5% gain for the week, but it happened.

The better way to look at the stock market was to go back to the Monday before the Thursday when the Brits went to the polls and our ASX 200 index was at 5162.7. To be at 5246.6 right now (that’s a 1.6% gain), considering what we’ve been through, says a lot about where stock market investor attitudes are right now.

The arguments for stocks are stronger than the arguments against, unlike January and early February, and the Brexit crisis reminded us why. Right now, central banks still hold the aces but I’m praying that we see sufficient economic growth in the US this year or we could be in trouble.

Overnight, Europe and even the UK’s FTSE were up, with the latter 1.13% higher. Meanwhile, the German DAX was up 0.99%, the French CAC put on 0.86% and the Spanish IBEX rose 1.29%. And get this: the FTSE was up 7% for the week and that’s the best gain since December 2011!

(The Yanks were a little less enthusiastic on Friday, with the Dow up only 19 points or 0.11%)

So you could say that the Brexit blues were beaten up by the Big Banks (central banks) of the world.

We needed help as I don’t like the bond market making history with headlines like this: “30-year US bond yield hits record low amid global bond rally.”

When scaredy cats buy bonds like there’s no tomorrow, it pushes down yields to these record low levels and makes me worry about tomorrow.

Central banks have to create economic growth or else there could be a serious crisis of confidence. Happily, the Yanks have upgraded their first quarter growth this week from 0.8% to 1.1% and the BBC reported this week that “Economists currently expect second quarter growth in 2016 to be close to 2.4%,” which is a great boost in economic activity, if it happens.

Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS, said: “Consumers will resume their role as the powerhouse of the US economy, with personal consumption expenditures in the second quarter estimated to grow by 3.7%.” These are the kinds of stories that will prove the bond market wrong.

So it was the threat of what central banks can do to beat the negative effects of a Brexit that has helped stocks this week. However, stocks must face the headwinds of potential EU rebellions by the likes of Italy and other struggling economies and then there’s the Trump terror out there waiting to hit and hurt markets.

The head scratcher fact of the week was the rebounds of the likes of BHP Billiton, which spiked 8.8% and Rio Tinto up 7.6%. I like it as I’ve been talking up material stocks and so have many of my expert buddies but it’s still a little hard to explain.

There wasn’t great economic data out of China or Japan this week, so these rises are harder to comprehend. I guess I should thank central banks.

What I liked

What I didn’t like

Election comment

I think my colleague Paul Rickard did a great piece on what a Labor victory in the election might mean [1] and it’s worth reading.  I believe we need a period of stability in unstable times, with unknown terrorism and Trump threats out there worrying markets, along with known unknowns such as Brexit’s effects, Fed interest rate rises ahead and the failure of economies such as Japan and Europe to grow sufficiently fast to KO negative interest rates.

While I think the Coalition’s super changes weren’t thought out properly, I suspect good sense and a troublesome Senate will modify some of these regrettable reforms. A Labor victory wouldn’t be a complete disaster – I rate Chris Bowen – but it won’t help market and business confidence, which have been on a nice and overdue comeback. Also, I don’t think we need a change to negative gearing, when there are dopes out there predicting the housing bubble will burst. I don’t see it as a bubble, maybe more a manageable balloon but could Labor hold the pin that could prick that balloon? That’s an important issue if tomorrow we’re talking about a Prime Minister Shorten.

Top stocks – how they fared

[table “189” not found /]

The week in review

(click the blue text to read more)

What moved the market

The week ahead

Australia

Overseas

Calls of the week

Food for thought

It always seems impossible until it’s done – Nelson Mandela

Last week’s TV roundup

Stocks shorted

ASIC releases data daily on the major short positions in the market. These are the stocks with the highest proportion of their ordinary shares that have been sold short, which could suggest investors are expecting the price to come down. The table also shows how this has changed compared to the week before.

This week, one of the biggest movers was Corp Travel with an increase in the proportion of shares sold short from 6.59% to 7.60%. Flight Centre followed, increasing from 10.55% to 11.45%.

20160701-shortpositions [15]

Source: ASIC

My favourite charts

Brexit blues kicked to the curb

20160701-markets [16]

Here is the ‘well-der’ moment of global stock markets after people worked out they overreacted to the Brexit.

US economy revs up?

20160701-consumer spending [17]

Yellen would be one happy chap after the key US economic indicator, consumer spending, rose 0.4% higher to 11372.9 billion (USD). This is a great sign because what US consumers spend drives two-thirds of economic growth.

Top 5 most clicked on stories

Recent Switzer Super Reports

Important: This content has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual. It does not constitute formal advice. Consider the appropriateness of the information in regards to your circumstances.